10-Rep Learning ~ Teague's Tech Treks

Learning Technology & Tech Observations by Dr. Helen Teague

By

Research Focus for Learner-Centric Surveys or Polls

ConstructivismResearchBasis by Helen Teague

Learner-Centric Survey Research Focus

                                                                                           References

Asmara, J. (2023). Pre-print- Online Learning in supporting students’ procedural abilities viewed from a Constructivist approach. Universitas Negeri Surabaya. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3466684/v1.

Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S. M.Land(Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25–56). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Chelliq, I., Anoir, L., Erradi, M., & Khaldi, M. (2023). Transition from Face-to-Face to E-Learning and pedagogical model. In Emerging Trends and Historical Perspectives Surrounding Digital Transformation in Education: Achieving Open and Blended Learning Environments (pp. 52-77). IGI Global.

Cleveland-Innes, M., Garrison, R., & Kinsel, E. (2007). Role adjustment for learners in an online community of inquiry: Identifying the challenges of incoming online learners. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 2(1), 1-16.

de Oliveira, A. M., & Schmitt, M. A. R.(2023). Google Classroom in the teaching and learning process From Piaget’s perspective. International Journal of Arts and Social Science (6)9 www.ijassjournal.com ISSN: 2581-7922, Volume 6 Issue 9, September 2023

Larson, B. E., & Keiper, T. A. (2002). Classroom discussion and threaded electronic discussion: Learning in two arenas. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2(1), 45-62.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Piaget, J. (1970). Psychology and Epistemology: Towards a theory of knowledge. Penguin Books

Szabó, F., & Csépes, I. (2023). Constructivism in language pedagogy. Hungarian Educational Research Journal,13(3), 405-417.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. Jolm-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Wenger, E. (2011). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. University of Oregon. Link

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems thinker, 9(5), 2-3.

*in papers

 

By

Prioritizing meaning making in Digital Storytelling: A Latte with Angeline Koh

Prioritizing meaning making in Digital Storytelling: A Latte with Angeline Koh

The Hotel Jen in Singapore is known for steaming salted caramel lattes served in a tiny cafe surrounded by artwork, photographs of Singapore landmarks, tall chairs, and gentle nudges toward languid conversation.

Today was the perfect day for sips and smiles with my friend, Angeline Koh. Angeline is the Director / Principal Storytelling Coach at Tyros Global. Angeline’s digital storytelling work has been featured in a National Day Rally for Singapore’s Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

On my first trip to Singapore, my fellow doctoral colleague, Oscar Guzman, arranged for Angeline Koh to speak to our digital storytelling SIG (special interest group). Then, the first insight I learned from Angeline Koh is that “Conversations become as much about story-telling as ‘story-listening'” (Koh, personal communication, March 17, 2015). Angeline and I went on to co-present a digital storytelling session for Pepperdine GSEP Student/Alumni Symposium in 2016.

Today, I had my notebook ready to learn more.

As our latte’s cooled, Angeline agreed to speak a little about the universal appeal of digital storytelling.

The sharing of ideas, experiences, and cultural perspectives found in digital storytelling videos has the potential to shape a common and dynamic cultural and historical heritage, background (Barab & Duffy, 2000) while intersecting and strengthening different perspectives (Beare, 2008) and building trust (Copeland, S., & De Moor, 2018).

Angeline Koh promotes storytelling as a tool for empowerment for us to “live our great story.”

 

Angeline enthusiastically encourages the art of storytelling expression reflecting “a community with a significant history, a common cultural heritage” (Barab & Duffy, 2000, p. 14).

Digital storytelling provides opportunities for many people in healthcare, business, and education to utilize multimodal affordances in meaningmaking (Teague & Pruett, 2016; Kress, 2010).

 

Digital storytelling production forms a foundational commonality that mirrors Lave’s anthropological conclusion that “meaning is connected to practices and contexts” (in Barab & Duffy, 2000). The meaning-making experience is pivotal to obliterate bias in communication, increase awareness of stereotypes among generations, and encourage open channels of dialogue

These digital storytelling conversations often extend beyond the contest submission incident to additional conversations. Students describe a strengthening of their identity and seeing themselves included in the aging continuum. Identity is
a vital and essential component of Communities of Practice (Wenger, 1998). Stories from older adults to the younger, listening student, reflect the older adults’ identity and purpose. They offer a shared knowledge between the senior subject of the photo and the younger student apprentice. Continual dialogue prevents a community of practice from becoming a “hostage” to understanding (Lave and Wenger, 1991, p. 10). As a result of the contest experience, a nurtured practice
develops. The practice is a shared history of intergenerational learning in an ongoing, social and interactive arena (Lave and Wenger, p. 101).

Or, as Angeline says, “You can tell a story. Digitally.”

Thank you, Angeline, for a very enlightening Latte break!

(l to r) Angeline Koh and Helen Teague, Hotel Jen, Singapore

 

Learn more about Angeline here.

~~~~

References

Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. Theoretical foundations of learning environments, 1(1), 25-55.

Copeland, S., & De Moor, A. (2018). Community Digital Storytelling for Collective Intelligence: towards a Storytelling Cycle of Trust. AI & SOCIETY33(1), 101-111.

Hardy, P., & Sumner, T. (Eds.). (2018). Cultivating compassion: How digital storytelling is transforming healthcare. Springer.

Koh, Angeline. Personal Communication, Singapore. March 15, 2015.

Kress, G. (2010) Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.

Lave, J., Wenger, E., (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (Vol. 521423740). Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

Teague, H., & Pruett, C. (2016, April). Intergenerational Digital Storytelling Goes Global and Mobile: The Images of Aging Photocontest. In Global Learn (pp. 414-419). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2-3.

Skip to toolbar